Sergey Tiviakov has been the leader inwards the principal lawsuit for much of its course of didactics but he lost on Fri as well as allowed Vasyl Ivanchuk to overtake him with ane circular to play. If the Ukrainian super-grandmaster stays ahead inwards the in conclusion round, it volition his 4th large tournament victory inwards a row (Havana, Foros, Odessa, Montreal). He has been a huge star for over xv years, as well as ane of the few players who could frighten Garry Kasparov, yet has never works life this score of consistency before. His latest run way that he has broken into what we've been calling the 'big three' (Anand, Kramnik, Topalov) equally a quick calculation of his rating shows that he volition endure ahead of Topalov later the terminal circular fifty-fifty if he loses. If he wins, I holler upwards he volition genuinely perish ahead of Kramnik, despite the footing champion's victory inwards Dortmund. Their July ratings are Anand 2792, Topalov as well as Kramnik both 2769, Ivanchuk 2762. Kramnik gains 10 from Dortmund, piece Ivanchuk gained nine from Foros as well as would gain unopen to other nine or 10 from Montreal if he beats Harikrishna inwards the in conclusion round.
That eventuality would perish far Anand 2792, Ivanchuk 2780, Kramnik 2779, Topalov 2769. Whatever happens, it's pretty clear that nosotros should endure talking virtually a 'big four' these days. And, inwards the post-Kasparov chess world, the initial missive of the alphabet 'K' inwards the surname is no longer equally magical equally an initial missive of the alphabet 'V' inwards your forename.
A win, past times the way, is past times no way a formality for Ivanchuk inwards the in conclusion round. Harikrishna already has the scalps of Short as well as Tiviakov to his credit therefore far inwards this tournament as well as he is inwards first-class form. He could win the tournament himself past times beating Ivanchuk.
Which brings me to the principal talking signal of the Montreal event: the dismal showing of Nigel Short. He got off to an absolutely dreadful start, 0/4, which became ½/6 (thereby equalling his ½00000 get at the 1980 Phillips as well as Drew tournament when he was xiv years 10 months old). It is reported that he was suffering from dental problems, which is indeed unfortunate, though I'm also told that Alekhine had similar problems inwards the early on stages of his footing entitle fit against Capablanca, had vi teeth pulled out as well as went on to perish footing champion.
I am struggling to holler upwards of unopen to other stellar instrumentalist of whatsoever era who has scored therefore few points inwards a similar context. It has happened inwards matchplay, of course of didactics (Taimanov/Larsen v Fischer, Adams v Hydra, Miles v Kasparov bound to mind), but non inwards tournaments with sub-2700 opposition available.
Since therefore Short has drawn with Kamsky (playing the Ponziani - a smashing rarity at this level, but a long-time favourite opening of the BCM editor) as well as therefore beating Elyanov inwards circular eight. He all the same has a adventure to avoid the wooden spoon if he beats Bluvshtein inwards the terminal circular (they drew inwards a Petroff inwards the recent Canadian Open incidentally). Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 terminal score of 3/9 would hardly stand upwards for a Topalovian come-back but that would at to the lowest degree clit dorsum his TPR to 2522 as well as a rating loss of entirely virtually nineteen points.
One cannot aid wondering whether the dental work was the entirely argue for Short's debacle or whether yet unopen to other airing of his ancient grudge against Kamsky later circular 2 may stimulate got been a contributory factor. The English linguistic communication grandmaster has an elephantine retention for slights as well as disputes from the past times as well as his inability to perish on a statesmanlike quiet could peradventure endure his Achilles heel inwards a tournament context. It was noticeable how he occasionally liked to dust off as well as rehash unopen to old vendetta inwards ane of his paper columns whenever at that topographic point was a deadening intelligence calendar week inwards chess. Sometimes entertaining, sometimes offensive, but he no longer has this conduit for his pent-up aggression. Whatever the rights as well as wrongs of what happened betwixt the Kamskys as well as Short all those years ago, he should sure enough stimulate got channelled all the remaining aggro into their private game inwards Montreal as well as permit the pieces create the talking. And, if I powerfulness endure permitted to patronise the old footing entitle finalist farther on his selection of opening (just this ane fourth dimension - I hope it volition never move on again): the Ponziani is non a practiced selection if yous desire to play for a win with White. Believe me, I've tried as well as it's non upwards to the job.
One affair virtually this tournament that I definitely don't like: the fourth dimension limit. They've got a smashing plain of players, playing ane circular a day, as well as they foist FIDE's rotten fourth dimension command on them. Why? Oh, as well as why the early on even start? It was going to endure 6pm but therefore (after the players understandably grumbled) they moved it dorsum to 5pm. But that all the same seems besides belatedly inwards the solar daytime to me. 1pm to 8pm, proper fourth dimension command (or incremental equivalent) should stimulate got been used.
Meanwhile inwards the women's group, Jovanka Houska went into the Pb when she defeated States owmen's champion Irina Krush, entirely to lose to the reigning British women's champion Keti Arakhamia inwards the next game. Both are rattling much inwards argument for the honours (although I'm struggling to detect the electrical flow tabular array on the official site. Both are sharing the lead: finally tracked downwards the tabular array on the chaotic Monroi site here. Arakhamia, Cramling as well as Houska Pb with 4/6, ane circular to go. Actually, looking at the table, this tournament has been mainly virtually 7 players beating upwards the piddling Canadian daughter Myriam Roy but therefore drawing with each other - apart from Jovanka Houska, who has been easily the most combative of the grouping of seven. She plays Cristina Foisor inwards the in conclusion round, piece Arakhamia as well as Cramling play each other. Sumber http://johnchess.blogspot.com/